John Henry
Procedural intake for Texas civil litigation
Accepting files (214) 673-1960

The catalogMatters → Johnson & Farst v. Carnes

267th Judicial District Court, DeWitt County, Texas

Johnson & Farst v. Carnes

In short

A hunting lease dispute that ended on the evidentiary rules. The response contained no competent evidence, the exhibits were struck by separate order, and the grounds the response never reached were conceded. Judgment on the whole case in March 2026.

Role. Counsel for plaintiff.

Fees. $19,394.12 in attorney's fees awarded.

What happened, in order

MotionSummary judgment on the whole case, with each ground separately stated.
ResponseExhibits attached without a sponsoring affidavit; factual assertions made only in the body of the brief; several grounds not addressed at all.
ObjectionsFiled separately and set for the same hearing, identifying each exhibit and the defect.
March 2026Exhibits struck by separate order. Affirmative defenses failed for want of proof. Unanswered grounds stood conceded. Judgment on the whole case, with $19,394.12 in attorney's fees.
Send a file

Same posture, different file? Send it.

Court, cause number, parties and dates get read off the document — you don't need to type them. Same-day answer on anything that arrives before noon Central.

PDF · 25 MB max · or drop it here
Step 2 — conflicts. One name, before anything is read.
Step 3 — how to reach you

Read by John P. Henry. An AI service under a commercial agreement extracts and summarises submissions so they can be reviewed the same day. It does not train on what is sent, and the provider deletes inputs and outputs within thirty days. Nothing it generates is sent to you — every reply you get is written by a lawyer. Unretained submissions are deleted on a fixed schedule. If you are opposing counsel, or a party represented by counsel, do not use this form.

Prefer email? jhenry@jhenrylaw.com with the document attached works exactly as well.