Orders

CAUSE NO. 24-0702-CC5 ARAMCOR, INC., Plaintiff v. TRI MARSH RETAIL LLC, Defendant IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TRADITIONAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT On this day, the Court heard Aramcor, Inc.'s motion for traditional summary judgment on its breach of contract claim against Tri Marsh Retail LLC. After considering the motion and Tri Marsh's response, the Court GRANTS Aramcor's motion for summary judgment. Aramcor is awarded judgment for liquidated damages in the amount of $44,658.57, attorney's fees in the amount of $28,929.12 and post-judgment interest. This disposes of all claims and all parties and is a final appealable judgment. SIGNED on March 7, 2025. _______________________________ PRESIDING JUDGE

Complete — one page.

CAUSE NO. 24-0702-CC5 ARAMCOR, INC., Plaintiff v. TRI MARSH RETAIL LLC, Defendant IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR NO-EVIDENCE SUMMARY JUDGMENT On this day, the Court heard Aramcor, Inc.'s motion for no-evidence summary judgment on Tri Marsh Retail LLC's affirmative defenses of accord and satisfaction, lack of consideration, lack of contractual privity, and the Statute of Frauds. After considering the motion and Tri Marsh's response, the Court GRANTS Aramcor's motion and finds that there is no evidence to support Tri Marsh Retail LLC's affirmative defenses of accord and satisfaction, lack of consideration, lack of contractual privity, and Statute of Frauds. SIGNED on March 7, 2025. _______________________________ PRESIDING JUDGE

Complete — one page.

CAUSE NO. 24-0702-CC5 ARAMCOR, INC., Plaintiff v. TRI MARSH RETAIL LLC, Defendant IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE On this day, the Court heard Aramcor, Inc.'s objection to the summary judgment evidence submitted by Tri Marsh Retail LLC with its summary judgment response. The Court finds that the declaration of Bo Avery contradicts the discovery responses previously provided by Tri Marsh, including in its initial disclosures and interrogatory responses. Further, the Avery declaration is conclusory and does not provide any underlying facts with respect to any alleged breach by Aramcor. For both reasons, the statements in the Avery declaration concerning any breach by Aramcor are struck and inadmissible. The Court also finds that the declaration of Kevin Wiley is conclusory and does not provide any underlying facts with respect to billing entries or the reasonableness or necessity of attorney fees. The statements in the Wiley declaration concerning the reasonableness or necessity of attorney fees are struck and inadmissible. SIGNED on March 7, 2025. _______________________________ PRESIDING JUDGE

Complete — one page.

CAUSE NO. 2016CV02672 UNITED BIOLOGICS, LLC d/b/a UNITED ALLERGY SERVICES, Plaintiff v. SANTAN HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, Defendant IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS DEFAULT JUDGMENT On ______, 201__, Plaintiff, UNITED BIOLOGICS, LLC d/b/a UNITED ALLERGY SERVICES moved for default judgment after Defendant SANTAN HEALTH SERVICES, LLC failed to file an answer in this case. At the hearing, Plaintiff appeared through its attorney. Defendant, SANTAN HEALTH SERVICES, LLC did not appear. The court determined that it had jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties in this proceeding. After considering the pleadings, the papers on file in this case, and the evidence Plaintiff presented on liability and damages, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. The court hereby RENDERS judgment for Plaintiff. Therefore, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff recover damages from Defendant SANTAN HEALTH SERVICES, LLC in the sum of $69,761.43, pre-judgment interest in the sum of $20,101.70 and post-judgment interest on the total sum at the annual rate of 18%, attorney fees of $1,500.00, and court costs. The court finds the following: 1. Defendant was served with citation and a copy of Plaintiff’s First Amended Petition on September 15, 2016. 2. The citation and proof of service were on file with this court for at least ten days before the judgment was rendered. 3. The deadline for Defendant to file an answer was October 10, 2016. Defendant was required to file an answer the following Monday after 20 days from the date of service of citation and Plaintiff’s amended petition; however, Defendant did not file an answer or any other pleading constituting an answer. 4. Defendant’s last known address is 2181 East Pecos Road, Suite 1, Chandler, Arizona 85225. 5. The damages claimed in Plaintiff’s First Amended Petition were proven by the affidavits and other evidence presented by Plaintiff. 6. This judgment disposes of all claims and all parties and is appealable. SIGNED ON ______________________ _______________________________ PRESIDING JUDGE

Complete — two pages. Transcribed from the signed copy; the scan itself is being retrieved from the archive and will be reproduced here alongside the text.

CAUSE NO. 20154623L UNITED BIOLOGICS, LLC d/b/a UNITED ALLERGY SERVICES, Plaintiff v. MOSS STREET MEDICAL CLINIC, INC., Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT LAFAYETTE PARISH, LOUISIANA ORDER TO MAKE JUDGMENT EXECUTORY On September 18, 2015, Plaintiff, United Biologics, LLC d/b/a United Allergy Services filed its Petition to Make Foreign Judgment Executory. Notice was mailed to Defendant, Moss Street Medical Clinic, Inc. by certified mail, return receipt requested, on September 28, 2015 by Lafayette Parish Clerk of Court, and return receipt was received by the Clerk of Court on October 12, 2015, bearing signature. Twenty days have passed since notice was given to the Defendant, and no response or pleadings have been filed by Defendant. THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING CONSIDERED, Let the Judgment in the above numbered and styled cause be filed and recorded herein and let said Judgment become executory. This the ____ day of __________, 2016. _______________________________ PRESIDING JUDGE

Complete — one page. Transcribed from the file copy; the file-stamped signed copy is being retrieved from the archive and will be reproduced here alongside the text.

CAUSE NO. 25-0131-C26 GREGG MURPHY and DAYLA MURPHY, Plaintiffs v. LIBERTY HILL CONSTRUCTION, LLC and THOMAS MCGRATH, Defendants IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS 26th JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER GRANTING FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT On January 21, 2026, the Court heard Plaintiffs' motion to compel arbitration. The Court considered the Plaintiffs' motion and the attached declaration of Gregg Murphy in support. The Court also considered Liberty Hill Construction's ("LHC") response and the attached declaration of Thomas McGrath in support. The Court finds that Plaintiffs substantially invoked the judicial process to LHC's detriment and prejudice and have waived their right to arbitration. The Plaintiffs' motion to compel arbitration is DENIED. The Court also heard LHC's Objections to Plaintiffs' Summary Judgment Evidence. The Court SUSTAINS the objections and STRIKES all documents attached to the Gregg Murphy and Johnny Ramirez Declarations as unauthenticated hearsay. The Court also SUSTAINS the Defendants' objections to the Gregg Murphy Declaration. Gregg Murphy, as a homeowner, cannot provide competent summary judgment evidence concerning the alleged deficiencies in LHC's work and did not provide any foundation for the opinions. The Court also SUSTAINS Defendants' objection to the admission of the Johnny Ramirez Declaration in its entirety where it was untimely under the mandatory exclusion requirement of […] [Page 1 ends. Transcript continues on the following page of the order.]

Page 1 of the order, as published here. The order continues beyond the page reproduced.

CAUSE NO. 25-0131-C26 GREGG MURPHY and DAYLA MURPHY, Plaintiffs v. LIBERTY HILL CONSTRUCTION, LLC and THOMAS MCGRATH, Defendants IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS 26th JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER GRANTING JUDGMENT CREDITOR LIBERTY HILL CONSTRUCTION, LLC'S APPLICATION FOR TURNOVER ORDER AND APPOINTMENT OF POST-JUDGMENT RECEIVER On this day came on for consideration the Application for Turnover Order and Appointment of Post-Judgment Receiver (the "Application") filed by Judgment Creditor Liberty Hill Construction, LLC ("LHC") against Judgment Debtors Gregg Murphy and Dayla Murphy (the "Judgment Debtors") under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 31.002. The Court considered the Application, the Declaration of Thomas McGrath, the exhibits attached thereto, the response (if any) of the Judgment Debtors, the arguments of counsel, and the pleadings and papers on file in this cause. FINDINGS The Court FINDS as follows: 1. On March 4, 2026, the Court signed a Final Summary Judgment in favor of LHC and against the Judgment Debtors (the "Judgment"). The Judgment is final, is not dormant, and is not superseded. The Judgment Debtors have not posted a supersedeas bond or made any deposit in lieu of bond. The Judgment Debtors' motion for new trial was overruled by operation of law on May 18, 2026. The Judgment remains wholly unsatisfied. 2. LHC is a judgment creditor; this Court is a court of appropriate jurisdiction; the relief sought is to obtain satisfaction of the Judgment; and the Judgment Debtors own nonexempt real and personal property, including the property identified in the Application and the Declaration of Thomas McGrath. 3. The Judgment Debtors are presently engaged in the dissipation of their estate, including by offering substantial personal property for sale on Facebook Marketplace under Gregg Murphy's name, by executing intra-family warranty deeds the day after the Judgment was signed, and by failing to respond in any manner to LHC's properly served post-judgment discovery. [Page 1 ends. Transcript continues on the following pages of the order.]

Page 1 of the order, as published here. The findings continue and the decretal paragraphs appointing the receiver follow on later pages.