John Henry & Associates
Texas corpus · live
Tex. R. Civ. P. 165a · dismissal for want of prosecution

The court is about to dismiss your case for want of prosecution.

A DWOP notice means the case is on a dismissal docket and will be dismissed unless somebody gives the court a reason not to. It is not a punishment and it is usually not personal — it is docket control. But it ends a case just as completely as losing one.

There are two different motions here and they are not interchangeable. Before dismissal, a motion to retain. After, a verified motion to reinstate — with a hard deadline of thirty days.

or answer one question
Rule 165a · retain, or reinstate

Where is the case right now?

Retain and reinstate are different motions with different standards and different deadlines. This decides which one you are actually filing.

What date was the dismissal order signed?

Where these answers come from

We hold the published Texas case law in our own index and query it directly. No vendor sits between the question and the answer. That is the reason a discrete motion can carry a price on a web page instead of an hourly rate and a hope.

881,255
Texas decisions indexed
6 ms
Median query, this posture
841,641
Parallel citations mapped
26 Jun 2026
Index current through

Authority that may bear on your posture Attorney reviewed

Pulled from our index for this mechanism and read by a lawyer before it went on this page. A green check means the decision is on point for this posture. It is not a statement that the case has been shepardized, and it is not a representation about its current precedential standing.

Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.
913 S.W.2d 467 (Tex. 1995)
The reinstatement standard, and it is more forgiving than people expect. The failure must have been neither intentional nor the result of conscious indifference — accident, mistake or a reasonable explanation is enough. A lawyer's negligence is not automatically conscious indifference.
cited by
228
Villarreal v. San Antonio Truck & Equipment
994 S.W.2d 628 (Tex. 1999)
Reinstatement where the dismissal came without the notice and hearing the rule requires. Due process is a separate ground from the merits of the excuse.
cited by
481
Texas Sting, Ltd. v. R.B. Foods, Inc.
82 S.W.3d 644 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2002, pet. denied)
How the thirty-day verified motion actually operates, and what verification requires. The motion must be sworn, and an unsworn one has been treated as no motion at all.
cited by
101
Knie v. Piskun
23 S.W.3d 455 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2000, pet. denied)
The court's inherent power to dismiss for want of diligent prosecution, which runs alongside Rule 165a and is not limited by it.
cited by
121

Counts are the number of later decisions in our index that cite the case. A high count means a case has been used, not that it is good law. Nothing on this page is a citator signal and we will not show one until it is produced by reading opinions rather than counting them.

Send us this one problem. Not your whole case.

We will read it and tell you what we would do if we represented you on this single task — what we would file, on what ground, and what it would cost to have us do it.

The read is free.
If you want it written and filed, this runs $1,000 – $5,000, depending on the facts and the court. It is a discrete engagement — not a retainer, not an hourly relationship — and it ends when the motion is determined.
One name. We run conflicts before anyone here reads a word of the rest.
Optional, but it is the first thing we look at.
Plain words are fine. If you answered the questions above or dropped a document, we will add that to this for you.

Same-day answer on anything that arrives before noon Central. Or email jhenry@jhenrylaw.com with the document attached — it works exactly as well.