Every passage below is lifted verbatim out of the citing opinion, with the
citation itself highlighted. Nothing here is a summary and nothing is generated —
it is what the later court actually wrote.
In Re Andes Global Trading, LLC, Smithfield Foods, Inc., Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp., Smithfield Fresh Meats Sales Corp., and Smithfield Direct LLC v2026-06-24
…if the relator possesses an adequate remedy at law. In re Auburn Creek Ltd. P’ship, 655 S.W.3d 837, 843 (Tex. 2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); see In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136–37 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). III. ANDES As stated previously, Andes filed a motion to dismiss its complaints in this original proceeding. According to Andes,…
In Re Arturo Perez and Texas Materials Group, Inc. v. the State of Texas2026-06-24
The citation is in this opinion but falls in a part of the document the text extractor could not reach — a table, a footnote, or an image. Recorded as uncovered rather than dropped.
Kim-Lam Thi Vu, Eric Dick, the Dick Law Firm, Joe Radler and Joe Radler v. Texas Fair Plan Association2026-06-23
…is added)), aff’d, 337 S.W.3d 903 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Civil cases have likewise addressed the ability to agree to waive jury trial rights. See, e.g., In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 130–33 (Tex. 2004) (parties may contractually waive right to jury trial). Here, we are not faced with parties agreeing to proceed with just five jurors. This appeal does not concern any question about when or to wh…
In Re Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin, & Hubbard and Todd Crawford v. the State of Texas2026-06-23
…To show entitlement to mandamus relief, relators must show that the trial court abused its discretion and there is no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 125–26 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). To establish that the trial court abused its discretion, relators must show that the trial court reached “a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to a clear and prejudi…
In Re Walgreen Co. and Robert Alvarez v. the State of Texas2026-06-19
…ew are outweighed by the detriments. When the benefits outweigh the detriments, appellate courts must consider whether the appellate remedy is adequate.” In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). “The relator bears the burden of demonstrating that it is entitled to mandamus relief.” UpCurve Energy Partners, 632 S.W.3d at 256 (citing In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex…
In Re Dr. Robert Tafel2026-06-19
…lso prevents undue interference with trial court proceedings by adding to the expense and delay of civil litigation through parallel appellate proceedings. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004). But mandamus relief can be appropriate when the act of proceeding to trial defeats a substantive right that cannot be protected by a normal appeal, as when a party is forced to defend a suit despite Cong…
In Re Demaree Reed2026-06-19
…(“Trial courts have ‘no “discretion” in determining what the law is or applying the law to the 18 facts.’” (quoting In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004))).11 B. Reed lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. To be entitled to relief, Reed must also show that he has no adequate remedy by appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992). “We determine…
In Re Mandy Jo Cook v. the State of Texas2026-06-18
The citation is in this opinion but falls in a part of the document the text extractor could not reach — a table, a footnote, or an image. Recorded as uncovered rather than dropped.
In Re Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. v. the State of Texas2026-06-18
…(orig. proceeding). A writ of mandamus will issue only if the trial court clearly abused its discretion, and the relator has no adequate remedy on appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). A trial court abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to a clear and prejudicial error of law. In re A.L.M.-F., 593 S.W.3d 271, 282 (Te…
In Re Law Office of Ruben Franco Jr., PLLC v. the State of Texas2026-06-18
…We may issue a writ of mandamus to remedy a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court when the relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). “A trial court clearly abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amo…
In Re Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. the State of Texas2026-06-18
The citation is in this opinion but falls in a part of the document the text extractor could not reach — a table, a footnote, or an image. Recorded as uncovered rather than dropped.
In Re Homesite Insurance Company v. the State of Texas2026-06-18
…Houston v. Hou. Mun. Emps. Pension Sys., 549 S.W.3d 566, 580 (Tex. 2018)). Mandamus issues to “‘correct clear errors in exceptional cases.’” Id. (quoting In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). “As a discretionary writ, mandamus relief is never available as a pure matter of right or entitlement,” and “a decision granting mandamus relief in one case does not mean mandamus will…
In Re William Travis Hawk Jr. and Rebecca Mae Hawk v. the State of Texas2026-06-18
…ts discretion and the party seeking relief lacks an adequate remedy on appeal. In re Ill. Nat’l Ins., 685 S.W.3d 826, 834 (Tex. 2024) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Alternatively, when “a trial court issues an order ‘beyond its jurisdiction,’ mandamus relief is appropriate bec…
In Re Fat Cat Boatworks, LLC v. the State of Texas2026-06-16
…ts discretion and the party seeking relief lacks an adequate remedy on appeal. In re Ill. Nat’l Ins., 685 S.W.3d 826, 834 (Tex. 2024) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). “A court abuses its discretion if no evidence supports the finding on which its ruling rests and if the court co…
In Re Ernie Alonzo, Michele Pena, Oscar Salinas, and Dr. Mario Salinas v. the State of Texas2026-06-09
…s its discretion and a relator has no adequate remedy by appeal.” In re K & L Auto Crushers, LLC, 627 S.W.3d 239, 247 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); see In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). “As a discretionary writ, mandamus relief is never available as a pure matter of right or entitlement.” In re Bell Helicopter Servs. Inc., No. 24-0883, 2026 WL 1108684, at *7 (T…
In Re Germania Farm Mutual Insurance Association v. the State of Texas2026-06-05
The citation is in this opinion but falls in a part of the document the text extractor could not reach — a table, a footnote, or an image. Recorded as uncovered rather than dropped.
In Re Germania Farm Mutual Insurance Association v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
The citation is in this opinion but falls in a part of the document the text extractor could not reach — a table, a footnote, or an image. Recorded as uncovered rather than dropped.
In Re Richard Earl Purkey Jr. and Ashlyn Purkey Jordan v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…We may issue a writ of mandamus to remedy a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court when the relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). “A trial court clearly abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as…
In Re A.T. v. the State of Texas2026-06-03
…mandamus to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no other adequate remedy available by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). A trial court clearly abuses its discretion when it reaches a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to a clear and prejudicial error of law. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d…