Every passage below is lifted verbatim out of the citing opinion, with the
citation itself highlighted. Nothing here is a summary and nothing is generated —
it is what the later court actually wrote.
Damorian Dante Hall v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…r assessments—the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Our independent review of the record reveals nothing further that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 2 The court appreciates counsel’s diligence and earnest evaluation of the record for any discernable err…
Felipa Rubio v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…frivolous. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (“Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion that it considered the issues raised in the briefs and reviewed the record for…
Gustavo Perez Sr. v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…frivolous. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (“Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion that it considered the issues raised in the briefs and reviewed the record for reversible error but found none, the court of…
Oswaldo Ayalamelendez v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…the records and counsel’s briefs and have determined that these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Nothing in the records arguably supports the appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). III. Conclusion We thus grant counsel’s motions to withdraw and affirm th…
Mano P. Navarasasingam v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…counsel that the appeal contained no arguable points. We have independently examined the record, as is our duty when appointed counsel files an Anders brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). After carefully reviewing the record and counsel’s…
Emily Ann Hutchins v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…frivolous. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (“Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion that it considered the issues raised in the briefs and reviewed the record for reversible error but found none, the court of…
Kristine Ann Ellington v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…and counsel’s brief and have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.…
Douglas Lawhon v. the State of Texas2026-06-25
…and counsel’s brief and have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgments. 2 Lawhon fil…
Oscar Martinez v. the State of Texas2026-06-24
…filed, the appellate court may not rule on the substantive merits of the issues raised by appellant in his pro se brief, nor any arguable grounds in the initial appeal. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Only after any meritorious issues have been briefed by new counsel or by appellant following remand, may the court of appeals address the substantive merits of the issues raised. Id. On the oth…
Justin Lane Metcalfe v. the State of Texas2026-06-17
The citation is in this opinion but falls in a part of the document the text extractor could not reach — a table, a footnote, or an image. Recorded as uncovered rather than dropped.
Julio Gutierrez v. the State of Texas2026-06-15
…S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree there is no plausible basis for reversal of Appellant’s conviction. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). CONCLUSION The trial court’s judgment is affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.…
Noe Olmos v. the State of Texas2026-06-11
…wed the record and counsel’s brief and have determined that Olmos’s appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Nothing in the record arguably supports the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We thus grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.…
Kaley Brynn Johnston v. the State of Texas2026-06-11
The citation is in this opinion but falls in a part of the document the text extractor could not reach — a table, a footnote, or an image. Recorded as uncovered rather than dropped.
Devon Dinger v. the State of Texas2026-06-11
…and counsel’s brief and have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. 3 App. 2006). We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial co…
Robert Wayne Dugan II v. the State of Texas2026-06-11
…volous. We have independently reviewed the entire appellate record and, like counsel, have determined that no arguable issue supports an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). In the Anders context, once we determine that the appeal is without merit, we must affirm the trial court’s judgment. Id. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.2…
Demorris T Albright v. the State of Texas2026-06-11
…is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the entire appellate record and, like counsel, have determined that no arguable issue supports an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). In the Anders context, once we determine that the appeal is without merit, we must affirm the trial court’s judgment. Id. 3 We af…
Arturo Xavier Corona v. the State of Texas2026-06-11
…independently reviewed 2 the record and likewise conclude that the appeal is without merit. 1 See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 & n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgments of the trial court. W. STACY TROTTER…
Nicholas Sebolt v. the State of Texas2026-06-11
…or (2) arguable grounds for appeal exist and, if so, remand the cause to the trial court to appoint new appellate counsel to brief the issues. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record, the brief, and Appellant’s response, and conclude that the appeal is without merit. 1 See An…
Caleb Michael Leutzinger v. the State of Texas2026-06-10
…ecord and file a pro se brief, but he did not do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). However, the judgment signed by the trial court assesses “Reimbursement Fees” against Leutzinger in the total amount of $1086.00. The district clerk has filed a bill of costs, which reflects…
Zacimbricc Dizhay White v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…rocedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record and likewise conclude that the appeal is without merit. 1 See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 & n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). The evidence presented during the guilt/innocence phase of trial established that Appellant was a drug dealer who was involved in a shooting. While Appellant was being treated for a gunsh…
Joe Starks, Jr. v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…or (2) arguable grounds for appeal exist and, if so, remand the cause to the trial court to appoint new appellate counsel to brief the issues. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record, the brief, and Appellant’s response, and conclude that the appeal is without merit. 1 See An…
Edmundo Jr Santillan v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record and likewise conclude that the appeal is without merit. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 & n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Here, Appellant pled “true” to all violations alleged, which the trial court accepted and found to be “true.” We note that proof of one violation of the terms and conditions of a probatio…
Ashley Dawn Hamilton v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…rocedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record and likewise conclude that the appeal is without merit. 1 See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 & n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). The evidence presented during the guilt/innocence phase of trial established that Appellant was arrested for an outstanding warrant after law enforcement stopped the vehicle that she was…
Analiyah Marie Gonzales v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…rocedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record and likewise conclude that the appeals are without merit. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 & n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2 2005). Here, Appellant pleaded “true” to one of the violations alleged, which the trial court accepted and found to be “true.” We note that proo…
Michael Gonzales A/K/A Michael Gerard Gonzales v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…frivolous. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (“Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion that it considered the issues raised in the briefs and reviewed the record for reversible error but found none, the court of…
Kellian Antonio Jones v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…s counsel that the appeal contained no arguable points. We have independently examined the record, as is our duty when appointed counsel files an Anders brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). After carefully reviewing the record and counsel’s…
David Michael Nelson v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…and counsel’s brief and have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.…
Jayson MacE Thiebaud v. the State of Texas2026-06-04
…429, 439 n. 10, 108 S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Thiebaud is granted. LEE HARRIS…
Brian Eduardo Nelson v. the State of Texas2026-06-03
…80 (1988) (citing Anders, 386 U.S. at 744). We have reviewed the entire record and counsel’s brief, and we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (“Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion that it considered the issues raised in the briefs and reviewed the record for reversible error but found none, the court of…